5.1.4 [IRO] Impact, risk and opportunity management
[IRO-1] Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and
opportunities
The double materiality assessment (DMA) process was carried out in 2024. The DMA involves the
entire company across all locations and the value chain. In identifying and assessing its significant
impacts, risks and opportunities, the company took into account the understanding of the
organisational context in order to examine potential changes to the business model, legislative
requirements and the expectations of key stakeholders (as detailed in section SBM-1 Strategy,
business model and value chain).
To create the list of material sustainability issues that we assessed in our double materiality
assessment (DMA) process, we referred to the sustainability topics outlined in the ESRS 2 (AR) 16
requirements, internal analyses conducted during workshops with employees and the sustainability
team (experts in specific areas), and consultations with an external advisor.
In the assessment, we also considered legislative requirements, standards, available research and
trends in the areas of the environment, social issues, governance and the market, as well as analyses
of the economic, political, legislative and operational environment, findings from internal and external
audits, inspections and other sources. A total of 60 sustainability issues were identified.
Subsequently, the sustainability team developed criteria, classified and assessed these issues from
both the perspective of impacts on people and nature, and financial materiality. A total of 33 material
risks and opportunities (IROs) were identified and confirmed by the head of the sustainability team,
the Management Board, the Supervisory Board and the Audit Committee.
The identified impacts were categorised as actual or potential (negative or positive), and their
timeframe was determined as short, medium or long-term. We considered the interests of all
identified key stakeholders (internal and external) based on environmental/human rights impact
analyses, past events, reviews and interviews conducted in 2024 and partially in 2023. Surveys were
also conducted with key stakeholders, including affected parties around the company and all
significant stakeholders such as employees, owners, supervisors, suppliers, customers, the local
community and shareholders. Employee satisfaction and engagement survey results were also
considered. Our evaluation also took into account legislative requirements, standards, available
research and trends in environmental, social, governance and market areas.
For each identified negative and positive impact, we defined criteria and assessed the materiality of
the impact based on its severity. The severity of a negative impact was broken down into scope,
extent and irreversibility, while the severity of a positive impact was assessed based on scope and
extent. The criteria were designed to be as standardised and comparable as possible and were
documented. Each individual impact was assessed on three levels (low, medium, high). We also
assessed the likelihood of the impact occurring (from 0 to 1). Based on the assessments, we
calculated the severity of the impact and established a threshold (criteria) for its materiality. An
impact is considered material if the materiality score is 5 or more on a 9-point scale. By conducting
a thorough review, we performed an assessment of the impacts of the company's own operations
and the value chain (VC).
The company manages risks and opportunities in accordance with the Rules on impact, risk and
opportunity management at Cinkarna Celje, d. d. The impact, risk and opportunity management
process is a dynamic management process at all levels of the company, involving all employees. It
forms the basis of our integrated management system. This process ensures proper assessment of
the company’s impacts on people and the environment, the effects of social and environmental